Why would the section care who wins
If the referee did indeed call Hanley for flagrant misconduct, why were the tournament officials not told? Why were team points not deducted? Why was Hanley allowed to accept his medal? Because obviously flagrant misconduct was not called. I highly doubt there is any conspiracy to give Corning a league title, mainly because one team that lost a league title due to flagrant misconduct in the past was Corning. The Cardinals had one player hit another during a match. That wrestler was ejected and Corning ended up losing the WSL tournament as a result. Why would the section commissioner or the section as a whole care who wins the section championship? If the ref called flagrant misconduct at the WSL meet, it is his responsibility to make sure the wrestler is kicked out of the tournament and the official scorekeepers are notified. Obviously this was not done because it more than likely never happened.  
DeleteMsg ReplyToMsg
Original Message Topic:
Lanley should be done Started by Richard Jun-02 2011 I was woundering if Lanley will get to wrestle this week. The CIF rule says that anyone who is DQ will not be able to participate in the next event.Since the next event is a qualifier for Masters is Hanley done. If he is not done what kind of example does it set for the rest of the section. Also if he was DQ he should have lost all of his team points and not finished second. 
DeleteMsg ReplyToMsg Color Legend:
This color used for Message topics
This color used for Replies to message topics
|
|||||||||||
